Friday, September 25, 2015

Sherman's March to the Sea

In May 1864, General William T Sherman invaded Georgia with 100,000 Union troops. By September, Sherman had taken Atlanta. The General then marched to the Atlantic coast, destroying everything in his path. Sherman's tactics are now known as "Total War", meaning not just war against an enemy army, but enemy civilians, as well.
What is your opinion of the tactic of "total war"? Explain
Do you agree the old saying "All is fair in love and war?" Explain.

130 comments:

  1. My opinion about the tactic of the "total war" is that is very deadly because they destroyed everything on their path and they also destroyed all the enemy's civilians.

    I agree about the old saying "All is fair in love and war" because the south wanted to leave and they started the war and if they didn't leave then they may still have peace.

    Jason Zhang

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How does it become even more deadly than it was intended

      Delete
    2. I think it was because when Sherman marched his troops through Georgia, he left more than $100 million in damage.
      Sophia Shi 814

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. How does the situation become any more deadly than it was supposed to be. Sherman left over a million dollars worth of damage.

      Delete
    6. my opinion on Sherman`s "Total War" tactic is that it can be really helpful if the town they are attacking is part of their enemies state/country.So my opinion on Shermans "Total War" tactic is it is great for taking advantage on enemies.

      Delete
    7. in my oinion,i disagree with the qoute,"all is fair in love and war" because it would not be fair if the enemie team lose and their popullation of people had lowered down and the winning team acts like their town has won and have minimal damages to their towns and people.that is why i disagree with the qoute,"all is fair in love and war".- CLEMENTE CASCO

      Delete
    8. My opinion on Sherman's "total war" tactic is that it can be helpful in a time of war. The fact that the town they are attacking is enemy territory Sherman's tactic is a great idea for taking advantage on enemies.

      Katrina A. Guzman 802

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    10. Well, the Union at this point dosent pay attention to the South. But, the Union will regret this when they come back as a union.

      Delete
    11. in my opinion about tactic of " total war" is i think its an great idea to take an advantage over enemy's



      once they destroy everything enemy's would just give because they have no power.

      Diyorjon Isrofilov class 804

      Delete
    12. My opinion about the tactic of the "total war" is that is very deadly because they destroyed everything on their path and they also destroyed all the enemy's civilians.
      Jorge sanango 803

      Delete
    13. the union has like no idea what the south is doing so they might be out of luck

      Delete
    14. my opinoin about the tactic of the total war is that its very deadly jorge sanango

      Delete
    15. i think this is soo funny jorge sanango

      Delete
    16. i agree about tactic of "Total War" because if you want to win a war then you have to be as tactical as possible to get da mudda victory

      Delete
  2. My opinion of the tactic of total war is that it was a good plan. Although the plan devastated the south, it was necessary to win the war.

    Yes i agree with the old saying. i also agree that the south got what they deserved in the war. After the war maybe they learned how slaves felt when they were desperate when they lost their families and had to overwork. - Mohammad Ikbal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why was Total War a good plan? Why was it necessary to win the war?

      Delete
    2. How was this a good idea? The south got totally destroyed. This affected the union because Lincoln now has to work harder on Reconstruction.

      Delete
    3. I disagree with you because i didn't think that it was a good idea becauuse many innocent people died

      Jason Zhang

      Delete
    4. I agree with you, Jason because the Southerners didn't do anything wrong.
      Sophia Shi 814

      Delete
    5. Jason, I agree with you because the southerners are innocent. The northerners are not innocent for what they did. Katrina Guzman 802

      Delete
  3. We need to explain our first question with a bit more detail

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the tactic of "total war" is unfair to civilians because they should not be involved into war since they didn't attend it. I also don't agree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war" because war itself is already the most unfair thing to civilians. -Chaojin Zheng 814

    ReplyDelete
  5. Vincent Zhu

    I think the tactic of total war was unfair. This was because even though the civilians in the south weren't involved in the war they got destroyed in the war. Also they got their houses and crop destroyed so they also starved to death. This affected Reconstruction as well so Lincoln will have to work harder on reconstructing what the south has lost.

    I think the old saying all is fair in love and war is not true. This is because war is unfair to love or the civilians of the south. For example, General William T Sherman lead troops to the south and destroyed most of the southerners crops and homes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you becasue many died becuase they were just living there and they got killed. Even though they didn't do anything wrong.

      Jason Zhang

      Delete
  6. My opinion of the tactic of" total war" is that Sherman wanted the Southerners and soliders to feel the impact of the war. Sherman did everything he could, from stealing to setting fires. By the time Sherman marched his troops through Georgia, he left more than $100 million in damage.
    Sophia Shi 814

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great review of the tactic, but how do you feel?

      Delete
    2. I feel that if Sherman wanted the Southerners and the soliders to feel the impact of the war, he shouldn't do it more than he needs to. He just needs to make his point to the Southerners and the soliders and stop whatever he's doing.
      Sophia Shi 814

      Delete
  7. in my opinion of the tactics of total war is that it is unreasonable because first of all its their own country why would they ruin it and left nothing for the south.after the war they still have to come back together.
    i don't agree with the saying because the war is not even fair the union had more people
    -Cindy Lu

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1.Our opinion on the tactic of "total war" is that its a good tactic.The reason why we believe this is because, since Shermans total war tactic was to destroy everything in his path including enemy civilians, which cause the other side to lose more essential sources and become weaker. 2.We do not agree with the old saying "all is fair in love and war".To begin with,during a war, many people lose their lives.Also, in a war any side that has an advantage will use it and will not give the other side the opportunity to regain power and strength. Edita and Maytha 814

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree with you because even though destroying everything on there path may make the North win but many innocent people that was just living there also die.

      Jason Zhang

      Delete
    2. But if the south had their crops destroyed then the union will be affected as well because they depended on the southern crop.

      Delete
  9. I think the tactic of "total war" is real unfair and bad to the civilians because the civilians didn't do any thing. The war is not mostly cause by the civilans. The civilians cant fight people that have weaopn.

    I agree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war," beacuse the south want to leave the usa because they didnt want to freed the slave. lot of the slave die because they work all day long.

    shung huei zhu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't understand your answer to the second question.

      Delete
  10. I agree with sherman's tactics the south had done a wrong doing now they were paying the price . I don't agree with the quote. The war was not fair and the south was still on keeping the slaves . Ashar Akhtar 814

    ReplyDelete
  11. A Wise Man Once Said...
    In my opinion the tactic of the "total war' was no ta great strategy and unreasonable because after the war the they will all back together why ruin the south and leave nothing for them. I don't agree with the say because after the war the south lost everything
    -Qingyi zeng

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yan JIang (Jenny) class:814
    My opinion of the tactic of "total war"is that i think it is a very bad plan because after the war the north and south will be reunited again.
    if sherman destroy south and leave nothing for them it is just going to leave more work after the war for reconstruction,therefore my opinion of the tactic of "total war"is that i think it is a really bad plan.
    No,i disagree the old saying"all is fair in love and war" because in my perspective i think that civil war is unfair because the north is way better than south they have more troop than south and have factory that can build better weapon! therefore i disagree with the old saying"all is fair in love and war"

    ReplyDelete
  13. In my opinion, the tactic of total war is unreasonable because the south is part of the united state .They also relay on the south for their factor why would they destory them ,they will reunited and have to fix for the south and help.
    i do not agree with the saying all is fair in love and war because they did not fight fairly the union stand more chance against the south they have factories which create gun and more people so i don't agree,and noting is equally.
    -Bonnie 814

    ReplyDelete
  14. My opinion of the tactic of "Total War" is that i think that General William T Sherman is a guy who doesn't think what will happen because of his action. He destory the south without thinking that after they reunited the north have to help repair the south which is caused by him and his man.
    I disagree with this saying "All is fair in love and war" because during the Civil War north haved more people than the south. Also the north haved more factory so they are able to produce more weapon than the south. The Civil War was an disadvantage battle for the south but an advantage battle for the north.
    -Fanny 814

    ReplyDelete
  15. My opinion of the tactic of "total war" is that it means not just war against an enemy, but enemy civilians, as well. I think this strategy is bad because he marches to the Atlantic Coast, destroying everything in his path. - Li Zhi Lin I agree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war" because people fight for their own country. If you're fighting against them, then you become an enemy. Even though some people didn't participate in the war, they still get kill. Sherman's march to sea is an example of this.- Li Zhi Lin

    ReplyDelete
  16. My opinion about total war is that it is a very destructive war tactic that can cause enormous damage. To begin with, if you are destroying everything in your path you are making the enemy frightened which shows that you are superior. For example, you are destroying crops so the soldiers can not get food anymore. Also, you are destroying civilians who might be soldiers. So that is what I think of total war.






    ReplyDelete
  17. My opinion of the tactic of of "total war" is that theres war against everyone. I think that strategy is very bad. Wherever T Sherman goes he destroys everything . Once he destroys stuff, he never comes back to fix any of it . He doesnt think about what hes doing , or his actions after he does them .Now he left the south in damage .
    I disagree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war" because people are fighting against each other for the same country. North had much more tools than the south because of its economy . The north was always better because they believed in the more smarter or better things. The North was just fighting to get what they thought was good for the country and what would help many people. Unlike, the South who just didnt want to agree with the North . So there's no love in a war if your going against each other .

    ReplyDelete
  18. my opinion on the march to atlanta is that the march to Atlanta was bad because The general had to destroy everything in his path. It can kill innocent people's lives. My opinion on the total war idea is that it can go terribly wrong because all they are doing is destroying everything in his path. Which that can include, unions people, innocent people, and farms. After the war the union might regret thus idea. -Ricardo

    ReplyDelete
  19. yes we do agree because There is never a spectrum of greatness or hatred when fighting your enemies or going for the person you love

    -Aryana, Azma

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ......................EXplain.....................
      :3
      -Cindy 802

      Delete
  20. My opinion of the tactics of "total war" is they were very dangerous because they were the enemy and they wanted to destroy everything in their path of the opponent country. I disagree with the saying "All is fair in love and war" because on what I've been through in the past it shows that love isn't fair all the time and that war is caused by fighting for what you love and it isn't fair all the time, because what happens if you lose? The thing or person you were fighting for leaves and forgets... Some wars aren't fair all the time either because what if they cheat sometimes and sometimes the team that's not suppose to win wins anyway. Sometimes nothing's fair to some people and love and war are included in that.


    - Aisha and Melyna. 802

    ReplyDelete
  21. In my opinion, I think that the "total war" is dangerous and very deadly because Sherman is actually forcing the civillians to choose his side and if they don't, Sherman kills them. Sherman is literally risking the lives of others just to get what he desires and that is a bad thing since he's turning his own people against each other. And it's not fair to others because they are killing countless and innocent lives even when they weren't involved.

    I agree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war" because you fight for your own country. You're actually defending yourself and your country but if you have to fight in a war, you become the enemy instead of someone else. And Sherman is also one of the reasons why there is a war between the North and the South. The North actually wanted peace with the South but, since Sherman started attacking the south, the south gets angry and fights back because Sherman is the one that provoked the South into fighting back.


    Cindy Class: 802

    ReplyDelete
  22. My opinion on the tatic war is that it was not fair to the people that were in their way of getting to the Atlantic coast because out of no where innocent people and homes were getting hurt,destroyed and attacked

    I don't agree to the saying "All is fair in love and war" because love ones can get killed during war but it will never be fair to the other loved one because they will be forever hurt.

    Sipro 802

    ReplyDelete
  23. i think this war is dumb because they lost the war and they have to repair the disasters they made

    jaemin ha 802

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lmao :P but it doesn't make sense though............... explain..............
      Cindy 802

      Delete
    2. can you please elaborate on your opinion? no war is dumb because they were caused and are happening for a reason.

      Delete
  24. In my opinion, i think that the tatic of " Total War" was very unfair beacause the South wasn't really part of the war, and the North made South caused sooo many damage. After the war, The north didnt even bother to give money, or anything back to the South. All houses and crops were destroyed.Their were no shelter and no food, so the South Starved. Meanwhile, the North is just enjoying the timeof prospiraty.
    I agree with the old saying " All is fair in love and war" because they are fighting for their own country.They are defending themselves. Even though after the war, the South caused soo many damage, the North didnt even bother to help the South.
    - Ruiting Mei 802 :D

    ReplyDelete
  25. My opinion to the tactic of "total war" is that it just means to push the relationship between the south and north more hostile to each other. I think some of the southern civilians agreed with Linclon's reconsturstion plan, but the south governers wants to break up with the Union. So some of the civilians didn't have a choice. I also disagree with the old saying"All is fair in love and war" because in every war the people that suffer the most is the innocent civilians. It is not fair that just for someone's desire to open a war against others. Yu Han 802

    ReplyDelete
  26. My opinion of tatic of total war is that it did not make any sense that Sherman took Atlanta. Also they went to the Atlantic coast and they destroyed everything in his path because they were their enemy. I do not agree with the old saying "all is fair in love and war" because in the war love wasen't fair .

    ReplyDelete
  27. my opinion about this tactic is wrong. He can not attack anyone for no reason. It says that he destroy everything in his path. he should destroy everything in his path like enemy's not civilians. I think that this tactic of "total war" by General William T Sherman is wrong .
    joel diaz

    ReplyDelete
  28. we agree that the total war was unfair because the north destroyed the south even innocent people. He even destroyed his path which is horrible

    we disagree with the quote "all is fair in love and war" because the north and south were both against each other so how can both have love for each other? destroying his path shows much hatred
    natalie and sheena

    ReplyDelete
  29. my opinion of tactic of "the war" it means that they have war with their enemies and with civilians i agree with "all is fair in love and war" because thye will do anything for their contury.

    ReplyDelete
  30. In my opinion war is very deadly and has no meaning because people die in wars. And if you die what will be the point in all this?


    BAHORA UMAROVA 804

    ReplyDelete
  31. An Jie Zheng 804
    I think the tactic of total war was unfair.Because it destroyed the house and plantation of the south,and south didn't join the war.
    i disagree of all is fair in love and war,because they didn't treat south well,they get destroy everything in the war.

    ReplyDelete
  32. My opinion of tactic of the "total war" is i think it very deadly and not reasonable because when sherman is attacking he is also attacking the united state and he is a part of united state but he want to destory all the stuff he see

    I agree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war" because when people want something they want and the contury didnt agree with it they will start a war

    ReplyDelete
  33. In my opinion of tactic of "total war" is dangerous and deadly,because they fight,and lot of people die and get hurt.
    I agree with "all is fair in love and war' because if the south didn't leave,so they won't get in fight.
    Meilingyou

    ReplyDelete
  34. i think the total war's tactic is bad because it testroy more then u own it is not worth to fight the war.you still need to repair all u destroy.

    ReplyDelete
  35. My opinion of the tactic of "total war" is very dangerous and destructive. Also, a lot of people die and everywhere will get destroyed. For example, in this writing it says "destroying everything in his path". This quote means that he is destroying his own path, and that people will become enemy to him.

    Parvina Subkhonkulova 804

    ReplyDelete
  36. Bing jie zhang 804
    My opinion of the tactic of "total war" it is a bad plan.That they destroy south and leave .
    "all is fair in love and war"had die many

    ReplyDelete
  37. MY OPINION OF THE TACTIC OF THE WAR IS THAT IT WAS A BAD PLAN BECAUSE HE DESTOYED THE SOUTH

    ReplyDelete
  38. Tracy Jiang 803

    I do not think that the tactic of "total war" is a good idea. If you go and destroy everything left and right then everything would be in ruins. Why would you want to conquer and rule a city if it is already destroyed and there are no subjects to rule over?

    I also do not agree with the saying in "All's fair in love and war" because if you use any method possible to win a war then that is not a very honorable thing to do. You may not care but others do which just leads to people hating you more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rule a city? Subjects? Really?
      - ANNIE CHEN 803

      Delete
  39. I disagree with the strategy of total war because civilians don't have to take part in the war. Yes they are fighting the confederacy but don't get innocent people involved. I don't agree with all is fair in love and war because you shouldn't do what you want. Ashlyn Mendoza 803

    ReplyDelete
  40. Freddy capulin 803
    my opinion on the tatctic of "total war" was crustal because why would they attack on people that they are not fighting.
    the old saying "all fair in love and war" i agree with this quote because the south left the united states but did not want to let go slavery

    ReplyDelete
  41. WOULD U MIND GETTING INSIDE THE OVEN TO CLEAN ITSeptember 25, 2015 at 8:42 AM

    My opinion on general shermans war tactic is that it is cruel because he just came in and burned the whole south down and left so i disagree with the saying "all is fair in love in war" because what sherman was not fair to the south. He left the south destoyed and in poverty. In need of reconstruction too

    ReplyDelete
  42. Brayden morrison-I think that the this will be a good advantage for Georgia.Class 803

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree with u
      freddy capulin 803

      Delete
    2. you need to write more sir

      Delete
  43. I think "Total War" is way to harsh. It's one thing to fight a war and kill your enimes, but it's another when you are killing innocent people. Even if they are the enimes' civilans.
    I don't think "all is fair in love and war" is a good excuse. That's right. I said excuse. Just because it;s a war doesn't mean you can just kill innocent people.
    -ANNIE CHEN 803

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you too
      -Tracy Jiang 803

      Delete
  44. jasur khalilov 803
    my opinion of the tatic of total war is terrible because he destroyed everything in his path which is bad because those people did not do anything bad so now he is enemy to civilans too

    ReplyDelete
  45. My opinion of the tactic of "total war' is its very destructive because innocent people died and everything got destroyed.

    I disagree with "All is fair in love and war' because they didnt treat the south fair. Jeremai 803

    ReplyDelete
  46. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  47. my opinion of the tactic of "total war" is that its very deadly. not only that there killing innocent people of the south and there territory.
    I disagree with the saying "all in fair in love and war". yes the south lost to the north but that doesn't give the right for the north to kill innocent people,
    chaniece 803

    ReplyDelete
  48. My opnion on the "total war" is that it was very cruel because general William T. Sherman decided to kill all the innocent people that wasnt participating in the war. Just because he wanted to win but he couldn't kill all the non attendents. In my opinion,Sherman could've already win the war with 100,000 union troops and taken Atlanta.

    I disagree with the saying "all is fair in love and war" beacuse doing whatever you want might lead people to hate you more.

    Meiqi Zheng 803

    ReplyDelete
  49. In my opinion on the tatic of the "total war" is wrong. Even though he killed the enemies, he killed the innocents also. The people who weren't involve in the war got killed and it isn't fair.

    I disagree with the saying "All is fair in love and war" because nothing is fair in wars. Just like the Southerners that were being attacked and all was ruined. Their crops and thier homes were invaded.
    -Sally Li 803

    ReplyDelete
  50. my opinion of the tactic of " total war " is that i believe it was a bad plan, because due to it occurring, many people lost there lives, and damaged there belongings, territory.
    i disagree with the old saying "all is fair in love and war "because innocents died.
    Karen 803

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree with you all those people who werent part of the war died
      freddy capulin 803

      Delete
  51. I don't think it's fair with the civilians as they have nothing to do with that.They are not supporting confederacy as it's their opinion.So,I definitely disagree with "Total War" and even with the saying all is fair in love and war.Because it's not right to torture the innocent people without any cause. Arin Ilias 803

    ReplyDelete
  52. Steven Qiu 803- I think that he was wrong and tht he shouldnthave destroyed everything and hurt the innocent ppl

    ReplyDelete
  53. My opinion about the tactic of the "total war" is that is very deadly because they destroyed everything on their path and they also destroyed all the enemy's civilians.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I think William T Shermans tactic of total war was very cruel and very much an injustice to the people of the south.Innocent people had to die because of William T Shermans tactic.''All is fair in love and war.''Is an injust saying,in this case,there was no love just war.

    ReplyDelete
  55. my opinion on William T Shermans tactic was that it was a bad tactic because he killed innocent people when they had nothing to do with it.

    ReplyDelete
  56. my opinion of the tactic of "'total war" was unfair and a disaster. Since many innocent people died during the war and a lot of stuff got destroyed.

    i disagree with "all is fair in love and war" because many people died and treated the south unfair
    bob aka sandra .-.803

    ReplyDelete
  57. In my opinion I think that the tactics of the total war was a bad idea because if you walk down the south and just burn and destroy everything just to let the south surrender and free the slaves.If the north do this maybe the south will not be part of the country anymore and they will have a hatred between each other.

    Alan Wang 803

    ReplyDelete
  58. Charlie Calixto 803
    In my opinion the tactic of total war is a bad idea.The tactic is destroy every thing in the troops path.It not only affected the south's troops but everybody in the south.People who did not want to be a part of the war became victims of the war.The people of the south lost everything,and had to rebuild what used to be there.It killed innocent people,that is something that is now illegal in war.I disagree with the old saying "all is fair in love and war".Being fair in war is not killing innocent people.The saying is saying any thing that happens in war is totally fair.War and love are not comparable,one is hating and then to war and the other is peace with all people.The death of innocent people and children and the land of innocent people or a place were war is not allowed is not fair.I disagree with the old saying"all is fair in love and war"and I think the tactic of total war is bad

    ReplyDelete
  59. Dillon 813
    The tactic of "total war" was effective however I don't agree with it.
    I don't think people who aren't soldiers should have to be dragged into a war. The North did benefit from their tactic so they may not have seen it the way that I do.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Total war, also known as total war, is a country to mobilize all possible use of resources, the destruction of the other countries involved in the war capability of military conflict patterns. Total war has existed since ancient practice, but in the late 19th century became an independent science.


    I disagree the old saying "All is fair in love and war".Because no matter what the reason is because of the war or war

    ReplyDelete
  61. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  62. massieh harris 813, i think it is fair because the north needs to give them a sign that means leave north alone, but i think north should of did something else ensted of killing every one in their path.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Mohammad Haaris 813
    In my opinion i think the tactic of total war is a bad idea.The North did the benefit of their tactic so they not see it.I disagree what they are saying that it is not fair but it is fair for everybody and i think that the tactic is very bad that is why i wrote this.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I thnik what Sherman did was good. The reason why I say that is because he wanted to send the south a message. Some people would disagree with me , because they might think that the south wasn't all bad. But he did it for the southners who were bad. Sherman wanted to basically say don't mess with us because you will lose. Team sherman

    ReplyDelete
  65. tinfeng 813 i disagree because the total war they kill every one they find and this is bad so i disagree.

    ReplyDelete
  66. my opinion on "total war" is a bad idea. I think it's bad because they are destroying everything homes , and plantations . This could bring economy down . In a war it only should attack soldiers not civilans. Davlatbek 813

    ReplyDelete
  67. I think General Sherman Total war tactic was very impressive cause it made South very week and made them surrender.These destruction made the south no way except destruction.According to the old saying 'Everything Is Fair in Love And War' this strategy was great and i also agree this saying cause in war there should be only mission in war and love which is 'SUCCESS'.(Junaed Hasan-813)

    ReplyDelete
  68. FuJun 813
    I disagree of the tatic of "total war" because it's very unfair to the citizens because they didnt do anything.

    ReplyDelete
  69. In my point of view, the tactic of total war is not a good idea.To begin with, the north destroyed all the things that they went passed.They steal all the food,and clothing from the north and Sherman told his men to set fire to homes and, farm fields,this is why i think the tactic of total war is a bad idea.

    -Hui Yun Zheng
    813

    ReplyDelete
  70. Jie Wang 813
    In my opinion i think "total war"mean that Sherman destroy every thing in his path ,even civilian

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ADD, I disagree about "all is fair and love in war"because that Sherman tactic is to killing the thing in his path,destroy and setal the thing in south-- Jie wang

      Delete
  71. VIVIAN ZOU AND YALIN ZHANG 813
    in my opinion we think the total war was a bad idea. It totally killed all the innocent people.

    ReplyDelete
  72. In my opinion I think that, the "total war" was deadly and unfair, because they were destroyed everything what was on their path. Even though the south wasn't involved in it.

    I am disagree with the old saying "All is fair in love and war", because nothing fair in love and war. Thousands of people were died and the south was treated unfair.

    Kha Mohammad Mahee
    Class: 804

    ReplyDelete
  73. Jia Yao Ou 813
    In my opinion on Sherman's "Total War" is not a good idea because when he bring the union troops to the the south he destroy every things ,when he see house,people,he just destroy and kill them.I think even through they are south nation but they do not join in the war.Even they want to give south troop a impact but the nation does not do any things.And he stole food and kill people,destroy crops,agriculture Even through he want to win the war,he should not do that.I disagree with "All is fair in love and war"because is not fair that the million thousands of south nation should died because of his plan,even they want to win but it does not need to destroy south.In war they should just fight and kill the troops not inocent south people.Because of what Sherman do to the south it make them do not want came back to the America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do same work differnt content but I did not publish so I do at home again
      Jia Yao Ou
      Class-813

      Delete
  74. Long Hao Lin 813
    In my opinion the total war is very bad and very unfair because it destroyed everything and many people was died it is very unfair to south they killed people take away their food or destroyed their build and they just destroyed everything that south had.

    I am also disagree with what old said (all is fair in love and war)because it is very unfair they just let thousand of the south people died and the method they use is very unfair to south they can't not just let the south people fight each other that is why I think this is very unfair

    ReplyDelete
  75. My opinion of the tactic of total war is I think that this strategy is not good because Sherman lead his union troops to invade Georgia then to Atlantic coast but he should not destroy everything in his path. He will hurt a lot of innocent people that did not even participate in it, he will also destroy a lot of property that does not belong to him. I disagree with the old phrase all is fair in love and war because even though winning is very important t us, to our country, but you should not do anything for winning. for example, you should not kill or hurt people who had nothing to do with it, or you should not do bad things in order to win, like cheating in a contest. - Vina Weng

    ReplyDelete
  76. 1.in my opinion the tactic of war is unfair because they only go against the country instead of the civilian. those civilian are innocent plus they dont do anything so why they bother to go against them for. they cant go against them for no reason.
    2.i disagree with the quote because if there's war how come there's love, if family being separate.
    -Jiaqi Zhuo 804

    ReplyDelete
  77. 1. I thought that the tractor of "total war" is a horrible idea, because Sherman and his troops are taking away the life's of innocent civilians.What did the civilians do wrong? the only thing that I believe they might do wrong if I'm a Northerner is that they were borned in the South, but that should no be the reason fo Sherman and his troop to take away their life's.
    2. I disagree with the old saying "all is fair in love and war",because if there is fair in them, then there will be no devorces nor wars in this world. Also if there is fair , then Sherman and his troop will never even have this march at Georgia and killed many of the South's civilians.
    - Shi Chen Lin. 814✌️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On question 1 that shuld be a "should not be the reason for Sherman"

      Delete
  78. In my opinion on the tactic of the "total war" is very unfair to civilian because the civilian doesn't join the war,they are innocent.Sherman, a commercial and industrial city in northeastern Texas wanted the southerners and soliders to feel impact from the war.He trying to do everything he could,for example,he secretly arson and left more than $100 million in damge.So I agree the old saying "All is fair in love and war".

    Sophia Jiang 804

    ReplyDelete
  79. 1) I think "Total War" is a cruel tactic because it will make many innocent people die and injure, and everything will be destroyed in the war. Also, when a country put all its energy on a war, everything else stops. Farmers are not planting. Workers are not manufacturing. They are all being brought to the war. People will then suffer from starvation and poverty. So I think this tactic is dangerous.

    2) I disagree the old saying "All is fair in love and war". It is because in my opinion, there's no such a thing called fair in love and war. In love, we may love someone hopelessly but we can never request that person to love us the same way we do. In war, many innocent civilians loss their lives; however, are they the one who start up the war? They are merely offered up as sacrifices to the war by those greedy people who are in power.

    HoYin Tang 804

    ReplyDelete
  80. jasurjon 813. my opinion is sherman's because in1884 the most famous of all rejections: “I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected.” Even today, “a Sherman” is well-understood slang for a firm refusal.

    ReplyDelete
  81. jasurjon 813. my opinion is sherman's because in1884 the most famous of all rejections: “I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected.” Even today, “a Sherman” is well-understood slang for a firm refusal.

    ReplyDelete
  82. In my opinion of "total war". Was about to all the way to destroy other person,nothings left.I disagree with the "old say",becasue if there was fair at war then y they fight.So there wont be fair at war. CLASS:813
    NAME:Kai Feng Yu

    ReplyDelete